| |
|
Cordless Rechargeable cleaner is perfect for those little spills of dust and dirt that happen everyday / Accu-Reach Nozzle for strong suction
|
«
Quite Happy
»
Great little vacuum. Perfect for small jobs and spaces -- I live in Manhattan and use it to vacuum my whole apt. Ha! Obviously my apt. is tiny and this vacuum does the trick - with powerful suction and the ability to get into nooks and crannies fairly well. So far - very pleased.
Rating:
(4
out of 5) @ 2008-12-22
|
«
Great while it lasted
»
I used it for about 2 months, cleaning and charging it regularly. Then it started losing suction. By three months time, it had lost almost all suction and would only pick up dry cheerios off the wood floor, so I finally threw it out.
Rating:
(2
out of 5) @ 2008-11-25
|
«
Great Vac!
»
Good suction. Very light weight. Havent tested the length of the charge yet but it held up well for light jobs with frequent switching ON and OFF. Haven't tried it in the car yet but I think it will do a good job.
Rating:
(5
out of 5) @ 2008-11-14
|
«
Love it !!!!
»
I am on my third Dust Buster, not because they failed me, but I ran over my first one with the car when i backed it up while cleaning my car, the second one my husband wanted to clean it out, and just like a guy, did not know there were two parts to the filter system and he threw one out. So I immediately sent him to get me a new one. I now have a DB 14.4 volt and love that one even better. I never used the wet part on my old one so this is fine. I love the extension, and it takes up my dog hair and the crumbs in the kitchen, I also just turn my toaster upside down and suck up all the crumbs from the counter. I even set it to low, another wonderful new feature for me, and suck out the USB and card ports on my PC and also the keyboard. Love it love it love it.
Rating:
(5
out of 5) @ 2008-10-12
|
«
not so great
»
this one burnt out on me within 6 months. i've been through 3 black & decker hand vacs in less that 2 years of moderate use... giving up & trying another brand
Rating:
(2
out of 5) @ 2008-09-17
|