| |
|
Weight Watchers Glass Precision Electronic Scale is engineered to the highest precision standards with semiconductor technology and a multiple load cell system. Contemporary curves frame an elegant, impact resistant, tempered glass platform
|
«
Great Scale
»
Great scale, worth the price. I've owned this for about a month now, and it works just fine. It's precise (did the test of stepping on the scale and then drinking a glass of water) and simple to use (you have to tap the scale before you step on it, but it's not a big deal at all). Would recommend it to a friend.
Rating: 
(5
out of 5) @ 2008-12-17
|
«
perfect scale
»
This scale has been very reliable. Very easy to use. It's a great value for the price I paid.
Rating:
(5
out of 5) @ 2008-12-16
|
«
Good Scale
»
We have had this scale for a month or so and are very happy with it so far. It appears to be very accurate, has a quick respone time and is easy to clean. A good buy and the usual good Amazon service.
Rating: 
(4
out of 5) @ 2008-12-12
|
«
Elegant, accurate scale
»
This scale is attractive and sturdy and, most importantly, gives an accurate measurement of weight (it matched exactly with the measurement given by the balance scale in my doctor's office). Measurements are also consistent (weight does not change with repeated measurements) and precise (adding or removing clothes impacts the measurement as you would expect).
Also, one note about the red sticker on the middle of the scale. One reviewer commented that it was difficult to tear off and left a sticky residue. I did not have this experience at all. For me, the sticker was easily removed with no residue.
Rating:
(5
out of 5) @ 2008-12-09
|
«
Great for its purpose
»
Recently returned from a visit to our daughter in England, who has the advanced "Cadillac" version of this scale: body fat, etc. We were so taken with it that we ordered this "Chevy" model. We only needed the simple weigh-in feature. For this it is perfect. We also like the looks of it, as it blends in wherever we put it.
Rating:
(4
out of 5) @ 2008-10-29
|